The 2026 World Cup, set to take place across the United States, Mexico, and Canada, will be the largest in history with 48 teams and 104 matches. While excitement builds, climate experts warn it could become the most carbon-intensive sporting event ever, generating over nine million tonnes of CO₂ equivalent.
Dr Madeleine Orr, a sport and climate researcher, has criticized FIFA for prioritizing expansion over sustainability, questioning whether the event can meet its promised environmental standards.
Extreme heat is another major concern, with 14 of 16 host cities expected to face dangerous conditions during the tournament.
Past events in the US have seen players suffer from heat exhaustion, and experts warn that prolonged exposure could endanger fans, staff, and media personnel, not just athletes. FIFA has suggested adjusting kick-off times and using stadiums with roofs but has yet to provide detailed contingency plans.
Players and football advocates are increasingly speaking out. Former midfielder David Wheeler and Real Betis defender Hector Bellerin highlight the sport’s growing environmental impact, urging footballers and organizations to take responsibility.
Climate change is already affecting game conditions, travel schedules, and player safety, and critics argue that governing bodies are not doing enough to address these challenges.
With global temperatures rising and extreme weather events becoming more common, experts warn that the 2026 World Cup could surpass historical heat records, putting additional pressure on teams, fans, and organizers.
The debate underscores a broader tension in football: balancing commercial growth and global expansion with the need for sustainable practices and player welfare.
ADD A COMMENT :